Narco News: A Brit Reporter’s Undisclosed Venezuela Conflicts: "vall fired off two responses, offering little to no disclosure, which he ended by declaring:
“End of conversation.”
Gunson got is response in an hour or so before deadline, which he concluded with:
“This correspondence is over.”
Touchy, eh? It was Gunson who started the conversation, after all. He dragged Ekvall into it, but he doesn’t want to continue now that he’s been asked some important questions about his undisclosed conflicts. No problem: We’ll continue it with Civil Society.
The similarities in their “responses” are striking.
1. Both Gunson and Ekvall refused to answer legitimate questions or disclose their conflicts and potential conflicts..
Ekvall: “Al, I owe you no explanations whatsoever about how I make my living, who my clients are, or how I choose to spend my leisure time.”
Gunson: “I’m not stupid enough to lend credence to your show-trial (or your unpleasant little publication) by taking part in it.”
Keep in mind, kind readers: Gunson – “stupid enough” to have gotten caught in two undisclosed conflicts of interest this year regarding his Venezuela reporting – demands answers from others as a reporter. But when he’s asked questions"
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment